Hypocrisy in Justice: Nigeria's Dialogue with Bandit Kingpins While Nnamdi Kanu Languishes in Detention Without Medical Care

Hypocrisy in Justice: Nigeria's Dialogue with Bandit Kingpins While Nnamdi Kanu Languishes in Detention Without Medical Care

In a nation plagued by insecurity, ethnic tensions, and cries for self-determination, the Nigerian government's recent actions reveal a glaring double standard that undermines the very fabric of justice and human rights. On one hand, officials in Katsina State have engaged in "peace deals" with notorious bandit leaders, including Isiya Kwashen Garwa, a wanted terrorist with a N5 million bounty on his head for orchestrating killings, kidnappings, and terror in the North-West. On the other, the federal government persists in the prolonged detention of Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), denying him even basic medical attention despite his deteriorating health. This selective approach to reconciliation and punishment not only exposes ethnic bias but also risks escalating Nigeria's fragile peace.

The Bandit "Peace Deal": Rewarding Terror with Dialogue

Just days ago, on September 14 and 15, 2025, community leaders and government representatives in Katsina State's Faskari Local Government Area hosted a so-called peace meeting with armed bandit commanders. Garwa, declared wanted by the Nigerian Defence Headquarters in 2022 for his role in a wave of atrocities, openly attended the dialogue in Hayin Gada, strapped with ammunition around his waist. Flanked by other kingpins like Ado Alero and Babaro equally accused of leading deadly assaults, including the Mantau Mosque attack, he positioned himself as an "advocate for dialogue." Videos from the event show these criminals engaging with locals and traditional rulers, vowing to end violence only if "injustices" against Fulani herders are addressed.

This is not isolated. Banditry has terrorized northern Nigeria for over a decade, displacing communities, crippling economies, and claiming countless lives. Past attempts at amnesty by state governments have been criticized for emboldening criminals rather than deterring them. Yet, here we are again, the government opting for negotiation over prosecution. Security analyst Zagazola Makama reported Garwa's "sudden posture" as a peace advocate, but skeptics, including controversial cleric Sheikh Ahmad Gumi, warn against provoking these groups implying a tacit acceptance of their power. 

Gumi even cautioned security forces against disrupting the fragile truce. Why the leniency? Critics argue it's a pragmatic, if desperate, response to the government's inability to curb the violence through force. But it sends a dangerous message: terrorism pays if you're in the right region. Garwa, linked to raids across Katsina and neighboring states, walks free to "talk peace" while his victims' families seek justice. This "deal" isn't reconciliation; it's capitulation, rewarding bloodshed with legitimacy.

Now let us talk about Nnamdi Kanu's Plight, Prolonged Detention and Medical Neglect

Contrast this with the treatment of Nnamdi Kanu, a British-Nigerian activist arrested in 2021 and held in solitary confinement by the Department of State Services (DSS) ever since. Kanu, who advocates for Biafran independence through nonviolent means like broadcasts on Radio Biafra, faces terrorism charges for alleged sit-at-home orders and incitement charges IPOB dismiss as politically motivated. His trial, ongoing under Justice James Omotosho at the Federal High Court in Abuja, has dragged on for years, marked by procedural delays and jurisdictional disputes. The Court of Appeal discharged him in October 2022, ruling his rendition from Kenya unlawful and stripping the court of jurisdiction. 

Yet, the Supreme Court remitted the case back in December 2023, a decision IPOB called "judicial fraud." From October 2022 to December 2023, Kanu was detained without fresh charges a blatant violation of the Nigerian Constitution, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), and the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights. The United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention has deemed his imprisonment illegal, calling for his release and compensation. Even the UK government, of which Kanu is a citizen, has been accused by IPOB of complicity through silence. Worse still is the denial of medical care. 

As of September 2025, Kanu's health has plummeted. Recent examinations by a team led by Emeritus Professor Austin A.C. Agaji revealed liver and kidney complications, critically low potassium levels, and a suspicious armpit swelling that could indicate malignancy or infection. His brother, Emmanuel Kanu, deposed in a 14-page affidavit that Nnamdi has complained of persistent weakness and body pains. Doctors recommended immediate transfer to the National Hospital in Abuja, but the DSS has ignored their letter. On September 15, 2025, Justice Musa Liman deferred a motion for this transfer, citing jurisdictional issues during court vacation, and returned the file to the Chief Judge for reassignment, delaying potentially life-saving intervention. This isn't new. 

Kanu has a history of heart issues, hypertension, and an enlarged heart, with solitary confinement exacerbating his condition. His lawyers, including Chief Kanu Agabi (SAN), argue that the DSS's refusal to allow private doctors access constitutes "state-sponsored suppression" and cruel treatment. IPOB media and publicity secretary Emma Powerful calls it a ploy to silence a "prisoner of conscience" whose Biafran advocacy threatens the status quo. In court, Kanu himself has pleaded, "I am dying in DSS custody," even lifting his shirt to show growths under his armpits.

The Double Standard: Ethnic Bias and Eroding Trust

Human rights lawyer Chief Malcolm Emokiniovo Omirhobo captured the hypocrisy perfectly: "The Nigerian government cannot justify such glaring double standards. If a wanted bandit can be offered dialogue and freedom, then there is absolutely no moral or legal basis for keeping Nnamdi Kanu behind bars." Why court reconciliation with Garwa, a confirmed criminal responsible for mass terror, while Kanu a political agitator languishes without trial or treatment? The answer lies in ethnicity: bandits operate in the Fulani-dominated North, where dialogue aligns with political expediency, while Kanu's led IPOB challenges the federation from the Eastern region.

This selective justice fuels division. Protests erupted across Biafra land upon Kanu's initial arrest in 2015, and his continued detention sparked international petitions to the US, UK, EU, and others. Kanu himself petitioned 20 foreign missions on August 22, 2025, demanding enforcement of prior court rulings and his release. Meanwhile, northern banditry "peace deals" risk normalizing crime, as past amnesties collapsed into renewed violence. The federal government's approach erodes public trust. 

A Call for Equity and Release

Nigeria cannot preach unity while practicing division. The government must release Nnamdi Kanu unconditionally, as demanded by international bodies, and provide him immediate medical care. True peace requires consistent justice: prosecute bandits like Garwa, not dialogue with them as equals. Until then, these actions expose a regime more interested in suppression than reconciliation, dooming the nation to further fragmentation. The time for double standards is over. Release Kanu, heal the divides, and let justice be blind not biased by tribe or terror.

Protecting Our Daughters: The Urgent Need to Teach Morals in the Age of Social Media

  Protecting Our Daughters: The Urgent Need to Teach Morals in the Age of Social Media

In today’s digital age, social media has become a powerful force shaping culture, behavior, and perceptions. While it offers opportunities for connection and creativity, it also presents significant challenges, particularly for young girls growing up in a world flooded with questionable content. As a society, we must recognize the dangers posed by the decline in decency and morals on social media platforms and take proactive steps to protect our daughters. If you have a baby girl, start teaching her morals at a tender age and help her understand the risks of social media. The behaviors we’re witnessing online, especially from some grown women, are far from encouraging, and without intervention, they could have a lasting impact on the next generation.

The current state of social media is alarming. Too often, we see content that prioritizes attention over integrity, with individuals many of whom are role models by default engaging in shameless behavior for the sake of likes, views, or viral fame.

 The absence of decency is striking. Grown adults, who should know better, seem to have abandoned shame, disregarding how their actions reflect on themselves, their families, or their communities. One can’t help but wonder, don’t these individuals have village people, family members, business associates, or street friends who hold them to a higher standard? Even when creating content, is it too much to ask for a baseline of respect for oneself, for one’s children, and for the general public?

This erosion of values is not just a personal failing, it’s a societal crisis. Our society is becoming something else a place where shame and decency are increasingly rare. The consequences of this shift are profound, especially for young girls who are impressionable and vulnerable to the influences they encounter online. Social media is a double edged sword, it can inspire and educate, but it can also normalize behaviors that undermine self-respect and moral integrity. If we fail to protect our daughters, they risk internalizing these negative examples, believing that shamelessness is a path to success or acceptance.

Parents have a critical role to play in countering this trend. From a young age, girls must be taught the importance of morals, values like self-respect, dignity, and empathy. These lessons should be coupled with conversations about the dangers of social media, where curated personas often mask reality and promote harmful ideals. Teaching media literacy is equally vital, equipping girls to critically evaluate the content they consume and recognize the difference between authentic self-expression and performative excess. By instilling these principles early, parents can help their daughters navigate the digital world with confidence and integrity.

The responsibility doesn’t end with parents. Society as a whole must reflect on the example we’re setting. It’s disheartening to see some parents themselves contributing to the problem, seemingly unconcerned about the legacy they’re leaving for their children. When adults prioritize fleeting online fame over decency, they not only diminish themselves but also fail their families and communities. We must ask ourselves, what kind of world are we creating for the next generation? If we allow shamelessness to become the norm, we risk raising a generation that values attention over character.

This is not to say that social media is inherently bad. It can be a platform for empowerment, education, and positive change. However, the current trend of prioritizing Immorality and ugly eyesore behavior by supposed mothers over substance demands our attention. We must do everything possible to protect our daughters from the dangers of unchecked social media influence. This means fostering environments, both at home and in our communities where morals are celebrated, and decency is non-negotiable. It means holding ourselves and others accountable for the content we create and consume. And it means modeling the behavior we want our children to emulate.

The stakes are high. The girl child is watching, learning, and forming her sense of self in a world where social media amplifies both the best and worst of human behavior. Let’s commit to guiding her toward a path of integrity, teaching her that true worth lies not in viral moments but in the values she upholds. As parents, as communities, as a society, we must act now to protect our daughters and preserve the moral fabric of our world. The future depends on it.

Emeka Gift 

For Family Writers Press International.

The Perils of Undermining IPOB's Directorate of State: A Threat to Nnamdi Kanu's Case and the Broader Biafra Struggle

The Perils of Undermining IPOB's Directorate of State: A Threat to Nnamdi Kanu's Case and the Broader Biafra Struggle

In the heart of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) movement lies a structure designed for resilience and unity: The Directorate of State (DOS). This decentralized body serves as the operational nerve center, coordinating global communications, intelligence, and enforcement of the IPOB's non-violent push for Biafran self-determination. Established under the leadership of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, IPOB's founder and leader, the DOS functions like a distributed network ensuring no single point of failure can dismantle the organization. 

 Yet, recent internal frictions, external infiltrations, and deliberate sabotage efforts have raised alarms about the dangers of weakening this vital organ. Such erosion not only jeopardizes the integrity of IPOB but also casts long shadows over Kanu's ongoing legal battle and the overarching quest for Biafran independence.

Understanding the DOS: The Backbone of IPOB's Resilience. The DOS is more than an administrative arm; it is the guardian of IPOB's ideological purity and operational discipline. Comprising principal officers who oversee radio broadcasts via Radio Biafra, diaspora coordination, and enforcement of directives like the IPOB peaceful rally, Catalonia events and others.  The DOS embodies Kanu's vision of a leaderless, impenetrable movement. Its decentralized nature makes it "too hard for the Nigerian government to hack," as one activist aptly described, allowing it to withstand arrests, proscriptions, and smear campaigns. 

 This structure has enabled IPOB to grow into a global force, with millions of supporters across Europe, the Americas, and Africa, all unified under the banner of legitimate quest for Self-determination.

However, weakening the DOS through internal betrayals, disinformation, or resource diversion poses existential risks. Historical precedents abound: movements like the Movement for the Actualization of the Sovereign State of Biafra (MASSOB) and the Niger Delta Peoples Volunteer Force crumbled under similar pressures, infiltrated and fragmented by state actors. For IPOB, the DOS's strength is non-negotiable, diluting it invites chaos, as seen in the rise of groups and individuals that have target members of DOS and tarnished the movement's peaceful image.

Sabotage from Within and Without the Nigerian Department of State Services (DSS) has long viewed the DOS as a formidable adversary, investing millions in covert operations to dismantle it. Recent alerts from IPOB insiders highlight a surge in assassination plots targeting DOS members, including the Abia State Coordinator, amid frustrations over failed infiltrations. The systematic target of Mazi Chinasa Nworu member of DOS is a covert operation from Nigerian intelligence service. 

 In November 2024, the DOS issued a stark warning about the DSS's "IPW" (IPOB Political Wing) ploy a fabricated entity designed to lure members into Nigerian politics and sow doubt about IPOB's commitment to independence. 

 This tactic echoes past failures, such as the recruitment of figures like Simon Ekpa, whose Finland based faction promoted violence, leading to his arrest and further division.

Internally, the dangers are equally insidious. Reports of principal officers turning public offices into personal fiefdoms disconnecting lines, forging letters, and blocking verifications for asylum seekers have embarrassed the movement and alienated supporters. 

 Such misconduct, often fueled by opportunists exploiting IPOB's structure for personal gain, has led to a spike in petitions and fallout, mirroring the government's strategy of "divide and conquer." Activists like Chinasa Nworu have decried how these "fools" risk lives by prioritizing deceit over duty, potentially handing ammunition to Nigerian authorities. 

External critics, including some Biafran sympathizers, argue that IPOB's enforcement tactics have already caused economic setbacks in the Southeast, displacing families and fostering anarchy. 

 A weakened DOS exacerbates this, as uncoordinated actions could devolve into the very violence IPOB disavows, providing Nigeria with pretexts for crackdowns.

Implications for Mazi Nnamdi Kanu's Case

Mazi Nnamdi Kanu's detention since his 2021 extraordinary rendition from Kenya remains a flashpoint in international human rights discourse. Charged with treasonable felony, Kanu has maintained that IPOB's activities are protected under free speech and self-determination rights, as recognized by the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights. The DOS plays a pivotal role here, issuing statements that reinforce Kanu's narrative of a non-violent struggle and countering government propaganda.

Weakening the DOS could fatally undermine Kanu's defense. Courts in Nigeria, often accused of bias against IPOB, rely on evidence of organizational structure to assess culpability. If internal chaos portrays IPOB as fragmented or violent echoing Ekpa's unauthorized actions, it bolsters the prosecution's claim that Kanu leads a terrorist outfit, despite the group's proscription being ruled unlawful by the ECOWAS Court in 2018 (a ruling Nigeria has ignored). A disjointed DOS might fail to mobilize global advocacy, such as petitions to the UN or ICC, which have kept Kanu's case in the spotlight. As one observer noted, the absence of a strong DOS risks turning IPOB into "a toothless bulldog," leaving Kanu isolated and his release a key demand of the Biafra struggle further out of reach. 

Moreover, in a September 2025 statement, the DOS reiterated its dismissal of links to Ekpa, emphasizing peaceful self-determination amid foreign backed subjugation. 

 Any perceived weakness could embolden Nigeria to prolong Kanu's trial indefinitely, using it as leverage to suppress Biafran activism.

The IPOB led Biafra struggle seeks a referendum to restore the sovereignty lost in the 1967-1970 civil war, where over 3 million Biafran lives were lost. A robust DOS ensures disciplined mobilization, from Italy, Germany, Australia etc showcasing thousands of unified supporters. Weakening DOS invites fragmentation, as splinter groups vie for dominance, turning the focus inward and diluting the independence agenda. 

Economically, a destabilized DOS could accelerate the Southeast's decline, with critics already blaming IPOB for lost progress post-genocide. 

 Politically, it plays into Nigeria's hands, justifying militarization and eroding international sympathy. Despite four years of massive spending to destroy IPOB through infiltrators like Ekpa and blackmail the movement endures, proving its resilience. 

The dangers of weakening the IPOB DOS are clear: it invites infiltration, division, and defeat, with direct fallout for Nnamdi Kanu's freedom and Biafra's aspirations. Stakeholders must prioritize transparency, ethical training, and unity to safeguard this decentralized powerhouse. As the DOS itself urges, Biafrans must remain "vigilant and focused," rejecting provocations that could unravel decades of sacrifice. 

 In a struggle defined by endurance, a strong DOS isn't just strategic it's the lifeline to victory.

Ejiofor Calls for Tighter Bar Admission Standards to Uphold Legal Profession's Integrity

 Ejiofor Calls for Tighter Bar Admission Standards to Uphold Legal Profession's Integrity

Human rights lawyer Sir Ifeanyi Ejiofor, KSC, has called on the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) and the Council of Legal Education (CLE) to strengthen oversight and disciplinary mechanisms in order to preserve the integrity of the legal profession.

In a statement issued on Saturday, Ejiofor stressed that admission to the Bar should reflect both academic competence and sound character. He warned that weakening those standards risks undermining public confidence in the profession and the justice system.

Ejiofor said he has observed instances of conduct among some practitioners that fall short of professional expectations and noted the increase in petitions before the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee (LPDC). He urged relevant bodies to review and, where necessary, tighten procedures used to assess aspirants and to enforce existing codes of conduct.

“The task of producing competent and disciplined lawyers must never be compromised,” he said, adding that both academic excellence and integrity are essential for those admitted to legal practice.

Ejiofor recommended that the NBA, CLE and other stakeholders reassert their regulatory roles, reinforce training and ethical standards during professional education, and ensure disciplinary processes are effective and transparent. He said restoring rigorous application of the “fit and proper” standard will help protect the profession’s reputation and serve future generations of lawyers.

Senator Ned Nwoko’s Call for Igbo Unification: A Push for Anioma Identity and Unity

   Senator Ned Nwoko’s Call for Igbo Unification: A Push for Anioma Identity and Unity

On September 6, 2025, Senator Ned Nwoko, representing Delta North in the Nigerian Senate, delivered a compelling address at a conference in Asaba, Delta State, organized by the Igbo Unification Movement and the Ndi na Asu Bia Socio-Cultural Organisation. Themed “Igbo Bu Ofu” (Igbos are One), the event aimed to foster cultural, historical, and political unity among Igbo-speaking people. Nwoko’s speech centered on urging the Anioma people of Delta State to embrace their Igbo identity, unite with their eastern counterparts, and support the creation of Anioma State. This article by Family Writers Press International explores the significance of Nwoko’s call for Igbo unification, its historical context, and its implications for Nigeria’s cultural and political landscape.

The Call for Igbo Unification: Senator Nwoko’s address was a rallying call for the Anioma people comprising communities in Delta North such as Aniocha, Oshimili, Ika, and Ndokwa to fully embrace their Igbo heritage. Drawing on his background in history, Nwoko asserted, “There is no argument about our Igboness. I understand history very well. I have a degree in history. I know the migration of the Igbo people, and I know clearly that we, the Anioma, are Igbo.” He urged the Anioma to reverse decades of narratives that distanced them from their Igbo kin across the Niger River, emphasizing that unity is essential for cultural revival and political survival. The Igbo Unification Movement and Ndi na Asu Bia, the conference organizers, have emerged as vocal advocates for uniting Igbo-speaking communities, including those in Delta, Edo (Igbanke), and other border areas. Their mission is to reclaim a collective Igbo identity, which they argue has been fragmented by colonial boundaries, geopolitical divisions, and historical traumas. Nwoko commended their courage and vision, noting that their work aligns with his long standing advocacy for Anioma’s recognition as an Igbo entity.

A pivotal element of Nwoko’s speech was his reference to the Nigerian Civil War (1967–1970), during which he said Anioma faced ethnic cleansing and were forced to deny their Igbo identity to survive. Recalling his childhood experiences, Nwoko highlighted the lingering identity crisis from this era, calling for “truth and reconciliation” to heal these wounds. The war, marked by violence against Igbo populations, including the infamous Asaba Massacre of 1967 where hundreds of Igbo civilians were killed by Nigerian federal troops, left deep scars in Anioma. Nwoko’s assertion of ethnic cleansing underscores the trauma of being targeted for their Igbo identity, which led some communities to distance themselves from Igbo affiliations for safety. This historical context frames Nwoko’s call for unification as both a cultural reclamation and a corrective measure. By embracing their Igbo roots, Anioma can overcome the forced dissociation imposed during the war, fostering a sense of pride and solidarity with the broader Igbo nation.

Advocacy for Anioma State: Central to Nwoko’s unification message is his push for the creation of Anioma State, a proposal he has championed in the National Assembly. The bill, which has passed its first and second readings, seeks to carve out a state from Delta North, with Asaba as its capital. Nwoko emphasized that this agitation is not driven by personal or partisan ambitions, stating, “This is not about APC, PDP, or Labour Party. It is about identity, justice, and fairness. I have no interest in being governor, but I want Anioma to stand tall with its own state.” He aligned this vision with the aspirations of Ohanaeze Ndigbo, a prominent Igbo socio-cultural organization, which recognizes Anioma as an Igbo state. The creation of Anioma State would address the Southeast’s underrepresentation, as it currently has only five states compared to six or seven in other geopolitical zones. This disparity affects federal resource allocation and political influence. By adding a sixth state, potentially aligned with the Southeast, Anioma could enhance Igbo political clout and fulfill a long-standing demand for equity.

Broader Implications for Igbo Unity: Nwoko’s call extends beyond Anioma, advocating for a unified Igbo identity across Nigeria. He drew a global analogy, stating, “The Igbo man is Igbo everywhere, whether from Delta, Imo, or Abia. Just like a Chinese man remains Chinese anywhere in the world.” This universalizing perspective seeks to transcend regional divisions, positioning Igbo identity as a cohesive force for political relevance and cultural pride. Nwoko urged advocacy groups to continue their efforts in education and mobilization, emphasizing that collective action is key to realizing the dream of a united Igbo nation. The conference itself, themed “Igbo Bu Ofu,” reflects a growing movement to bridge divides among Igbo speaking communities. Organizations like the Igbo Unification Movement argue that reclaiming a shared identity corrects historical distortions, such as colonial map drawing that separated Igbo groups into different regions. Nwoko also praised academics like Professor Abigail Ogwezzy of the University of Lagos, whose research on Anioma’s linguistics and history reinforces its Igbo roots, providing scholarly backing to the unification effort.

Challenges and Criticisms: While Nwoko’s call has resonated with many, it faces challenges. Some Anioma subgroups, such as the Ika and Ukwuani, claim mixed or distinct ethnic origins (e.g., Edo, Igala), and may resist being labeled Igbo. Posts from social media sources indicate resistance from some Delta communities, with critics like Basil Okoh accusing Nwoko of promoting an Igbo centric agenda that overlooks Anioma’s diverse heritage. 

The Path Forward: To advance the Igbo unification movement, Nwoko and supporting organizations must address these challenges through inclusive dialogue and robust evidence. Engaging Anioma’s diverse subgroups in consultations can ensure the statehood movement reflects their aspirations, not just an Igbo narrative. Documenting historical claims, such as ethnic cleansing, with survivor accounts and academic research (e.g., on the Asaba Massacre) can strengthen the case for reconciliation. 

Senator Ned Nwoko’s call for Igbo unification, delivered at the “Igbo Bu Ofu” conference, is a bold step toward cultural reclamation and political equity. By urging Anioma to embrace its Igbo identity and advocating for Anioma State, Nwoko seeks to heal historical wounds, including the ethnic cleansing faced during the Nigerian Civil War, and strengthen Igbo unity across Nigeria. 

The Resurgence Of Pride: How IPOB Reignited Nationalistic Sentiments Among Biafrans Worldwide

   The Resurgence Of Pride: How IPOB Reignited Nationalistic Sentiments Among Biafrans Worldwide

In recent years, the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) have emerged as a powerful voice for self-determination in Nigeria and beyond. This movement, rooted in the historical struggles of the Biafran people, has successfully rekindled a passionate sense of national pride and collective identity among over 50 million Biafrans globally. As Biafrans navigate the complexities, struggle and deprivation in the British supermarket called Nigeria, over a decade, the IPOB’s impact on nationalistic consciousness marks a significant turning point in the discourse surrounding freedom, Self-determination identity and cultural heritage.

To understand the revitalized nationalistic sentiments among Biafrans, it is essential to reflect on the historical backdrop. The Biafran War of 1967-1970 was not just a conflict over territory; it was a desperate struggle for self-determination, human rights, and the preservation of the Biafran culture against the backdrop of systemic marginalization, deprivation and enslavement. The consequences of that genocide, along with decades of political neglect, have left an indelible mark on the collective memory of Biafrans. Resulting in the loss of both nationalistic and Self-preservative instincts among Biafran masses.

However, IPOB, led by a passionate, patriotic and charismatic leader in Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, has artfully harnessed this historical context to inspire a movement that resonates beyond the borders of Nigeria. Through social media, advocacy, grassroot engagements and a strong sense of community, IPOB has effectively reignited nationalistic fervor among Biafrans scattered across the globe.

The Role of Technology in Uniting Biafrans 

In today’s hyper-connected world, technology plays a crucial role in shaping movements. IPOB’s adept use of social media platforms has allowed for the rapid dissemination of information, enabling Biafrans to connect, share stories, and rally around a common cause, structure and leadership under IPOB. This digital landscape has fostered a global community, allowing individuals from diverse backgrounds to engage in discussions about their identity, history, and aspirations for the future.

Platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and WhatsApp have become virtual town halls where Biafrans worldwide can share their experiences and perspectives. Through videos, podcasts, and online forums, the narrative of Biafra’s past and vision for the future is continually reinforced, energizing a new generation of BIAFRA ACTIVISTS and advocates who are committed to the cause of self-determination led by Mazi Nnamdi Kanu's leadership structure; DOS.

Nationalism as a Tool for Cultural Renaissance

The resurgence of nationalistic sentiment among Biafrans, driven by IPOB, extends beyond political aspirations. It serves as a catalyst for a cultural renaissance, instilling a sense of pride in Biafran heritage. From a shared quest to unite all Biafrans systematically balkanized by Nigerian government, to the promotion of traditional music, festivals and art by some government agencies to literature and language consciousness, there has been a renewed commitment to preserving and promoting everything Biafran culture.

IPOB encourages the celebration of cultural traditions, festivals, the production of Biafran literature, and the teaching of indigenous languages among younger generations. IPOB also encourages agricultural production amongst Biafran farmers to checkmate the rise of GMO foods and agro products across Nigeria. This cultural revitalization not only strengthens community ties but also serves to counteract the negative stereotypes and misrepresentations that often plagued Biafrans as marginalized people in Nigeria.

Challenges and the Way Forward

While IPOB has successfully reignited a firm nationalistic mentality, it is not without its challenges. The struggle for nonviolent self-determination is fraught with political opposition, state-sponsored blackmails, infiltration, provocations, legal battles, and economic hurdles. Moreover, the movement’s non-kinetic tactics exploited by state-sponsored provocateur groups have drawn criticism both domestically and internationally, complicating the public perception of its goals and methodologies.

Nevertheless, the unwavering spirit of the Biafran people to the laid down leadership structure of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu and IPOB showcases a relentless drive for recognition and respect. It is essential to approach the quest for autonomy with strategic dialogue and diplomacy. Building alliances, fostering international awareness, and embracing peaceful advocacy will be crucial in navigating the intricate geopolitical landscape of Nigeria and the international community.

In conclusion, IPOB’s role in reigniting a nationalistic mentality among over 50 million Biafrans worldwide signifies a remarkable resilience and desire for identity reclamation despite challenges of different magnitudes. As the Biafran movement continues to evolve, it holds the potential not only to reshape the conversation around Biafran self-determination but also to inspire similar movements for cultural and political recognition around the world. Ultimately, the journey toward a self-aware and proud future for Biafra and the Biafran people will require unity, love for one’s heritage, and a commitment to peaceful engagement in the pursuit of the right to self determination.

Family Writers Press International

IPOB: Only DOS Can Rescue Mazi Nnamdi Kanu From Ralph Uwazurike’s Nigerian Government Treatment

 IPOB: Only DOS Can Rescue Mazi Nnamdi Kanu From Ralph Uwazurike’s Nigerian Government Treatment

Ralph Uwazurike, for all one may think of him, was imperfect but courageous. It would take a courageous person to boldly start this phase of Biafra agitation from Lagos according to a verifiable and irrefutable comment he made. Hate him or like him, the choice is yours, but he was courageous from the sole of his feet to the strand of the hairs on his head. Despite all his shortcomings, one can see the burning desire to see the freedom of his people.

In as much as the mistakes he made were insufferable, perhaps it needs pointing out that he was mercilessly sabotaged and setup by those closest; the people he trusted most.

The roles played by Igbo political class, especially Senator Uche Chukwumerije, are as fresh on the mind as an early morning palm wine before dilution with water. The extraneous issues forcefully placed on his shoulder through infiltration and polarization of MASSOB by external interests using Nigerian government as a proxy, were inorganic and intentional. There was absolutely no reason that would warrant the indiscriminate killing of unarmed civilians waving a harmless flag at multiple locations or the emotional blackmail imposed on him by rented Igbo politicians acting concerned at his mother’s death, neither would the Nigerian government get away with such a crime if the claimants to “democratic” gatekeeping did not approve subtly.

The expectations were high and, for Biafrans, the sequence of events leading to the harrowing destruction of MASSOB by the Nigerian government and her foreign enablers were emotionally draining.

Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s meteoric rise was timely relieving as it was gap filling. Supposedly, he learned from the debacle of Ralph Uwazurike that the best way to form a freedom fighting organization was to make it difficult to tell the leader as everyone is a potential leader. The mistake that cost Uwazurike MASSOB was the necessity that helped Mazi Nnamdi Kanu to birth the DOS.

The DOS was fashioned to mirror the Igbo governance system. It has no central authority in the form of a person. The central authority is a group of persons. Hence, it is decentralized and open. It is the same as chosen an eldest from each family therefore, it is decentralized. The chosen is a delegated validator. In other words, the DOS is an ancient blockchain from the people of ancient — Ndigbo in particular and Biafrans in general.

Mazi Nnamdi Kanu has made it clear that he sends instructions through the DOS. He told his traducers that the IPOB DOS is responsible for the day to day decisions of the Indigenous People of Biafra. He said, “whatever the DOS says goes.” That is, if the DOS says jump, without question you will ask “how high?” The DOS is the passcode of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu to freedom. It is what will secure and rescue Onyendu Mazi Nnamdi Kanu. The DOS is blameless and on that Mazi Nnamdi Kanu rests. That worries the enemy, hence the run from pillar to post.

Family Writers Press International

Unveiling Nigeria's Covert Tactics: Polarizing IPOB to Undermine Mazi Nnamdi Kanu's Freedom

  Unveiling Nigeria's Covert Tactics: Polarizing IPOB to Undermine Mazi Nnamdi Kanu's Freedom

It is now making sense. Of all the co-accused of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu Bright Chimezie, Chidiebere Onwudiwe and David Nwawuisi, it is Benjamin Madubugwu that is disruptive and meddlesome. For those critically observant with the knowledge of how the colonial empire operates, his subtly and slippery descent into chaotic manufacturing is not extraordinary. Every Intelligence Community classifies human interactions as though they are devices. There is always that USER INTERFACE (UI). The UI is the frontend. The IPO or the investigative officer will always assess you and file a report to a superior or supervisor who is a backend.

At the level of interfacing with you, the decision would have already been made on how to work on your psyche.  This operation is usually outside the legal framework and the subjects are either compromised beyond the current accusations or are proven to be ambitious or notorious for cutting deals and snitching. Such persons are capable of some level or measure of influence but underneath is their propensity to serve the prestigious government portfolio called double agent.

Most people that antagonize an established protocol or Command and Control of any self-determination movement with the flimsy excuse of trying to save a leader whose freedom of movement is a claustrophobic constraint from a kidnapping Nigerian government, incredulously do so with a cowardly argument that the leader is in danger from the organization he leads. That is a retard argument. Unfortunately, the media coverage and noise will not let people notice their lame argument rooted in their chaotic manufacturing.

In case you are oblivion of this fact, the Nigerian government, from the outset, already knew that if their initial infiltration strategy failed, their fallback option would be polarization. When that fails, they will find a detour to reinvent another infiltration strategy. Some celebrities, media warriors, content creators, legal representatives et al were initially sleeper cells telling you what you need to hear. Working on your emotions and building trust. It was only a matter of time before they were activated, became rebellious and go berserk.

The initial infiltration of autopilot terrorists and agent provocateurs failed, and so did the initial attempt to make certain people DOS members. With all that have been unveiled in the tortuous judicial proceeding spanning years, it is a compendium of evidence with a compass pointing to a freedom destination. The Nigerian government, as well as her extraneous enablers, cannot bear a stainless and mysterious DOS.

They need someone within, and since that is a tall dream, they need a polarized DOS. They do not want the DOS as it is. This is because the next option is a political dialogue and this DOS will accept such dialogue on one condition —the freedom of her member and the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB).

The Nigerian government on the other hand needs a teleguided DOS. A DOS that will be handed a predetermined script. The role of the duplicitous voices is to create a polarization.

Let us see if the Mbaise meeting has what it takes to polarized IPOB DOS. Because the truth is that a compromised DOS is a necessity for jailing Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.

Family Writers Press International

Boko Haram’s Brutal House to House Attack in Borno State Claims Over 60 Lives

  Boko Haram’s Brutal House to House Attack in Borno State Claims Over 60 Lives

In a devastating assault that underscores the persistent threat of insurgency in Nigeria’s northeast, Boko Haram militants killed more than 60 people, including seven soldiers, in a nighttime raid on Darul Jamal, a village in Borno State. The attack, which occurred on Friday, September 5, 2025, targeted a community that had only recently been resettled after years of displacement, highlighting the fragility of efforts to restore normalcy in the region. The Nigerian military’s intensified counterinsurgency operations have so far failed to curb the escalating violence, according to residents and analysts.

The attack began around 8:30 p.m. when heavily armed Boko Haram fighters stormed Darul Jamal, near Banki in the Bama local government area, close to the Nigeria-Cameroon border. The militants moved house to house, shooting indiscriminately and setting homes ablaze, leaving a trail of destruction. Babagana Mala, a resident who fled to the nearby town of Bama, approximately 46 kilometers away, recounted the horror: “We had been warning the military for three days about Boko Haram gathering near our town, but no action was taken. They overwhelmed the soldiers, who fled with us to Bama.” Mala reported that 63 people were killed, including seven soldiers and several recently returned displaced persons.

The traditional head of Darul Jamal, speaking anonymously due to fear of reprisals, confirmed the grim toll, stating that 70 bodies had been recovered by Saturday morning, with more residents still missing in the surrounding bush. “They went house to house, killing men and leaving women behind. Almost every household is affected,” he said, his voice breaking with grief. The attack also destroyed over 20 homes and 10 buses, many belonging to laborers working on reconstruction efforts in the village.

Borno State Governor Babagana Zulum visited Darul Jamal on Saturday to assess the damage and console survivors, according to a security source. However, neither the police spokesperson, Nahum Kenneth Daso, nor Lieutenant Colonel Sani Uba, the military’s counterinsurgency campaign spokesperson, provided comments to Reuters on the incident. The Nigerian Air Force reported killing 30 militants in retaliatory strikes after receiving reports of the raid, but the scale of the attack has raised fresh concerns about the military’s ability to protect vulnerable communities.

Darul Jamal’s residents had returned just last month, encouraged by government efforts to resettle internally displaced persons (IDPs) after years of displacement caused by Boko Haram’s 15-year insurgency. Borno State, the epicenter of the conflict, has seen over 40,000 deaths and the displacement of more than two million people since 2009, when Boko Haram began its campaign to impose a radical interpretation of Islamic law. The group’s tactics, including suicide bombings, mass abductions, and village raids, have left a lasting humanitarian crisis in Nigeria’s northeast, spilling into neighboring Chad, Niger, and Cameroon.

Despite military claims of intensified operations against Boko Haram and its splinter group, the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP), analysts and residents argue that these efforts have failed to stem the tide of attacks. The assault on Darul Jamal follows a series of deadly raids in 2025, including an attack in May that killed 57 villagers in Baga and another in January that claimed 40 farmers near Lake Chad. Security experts point to the military’s overstretched resources, exacerbated by the withdrawal of regional forces from Niger and the redirection of troops to combat banditry in northwestern Nigeria, as key factors undermining counterinsurgency efforts.

Governor Zulum has repeatedly warned of Boko Haram’s resurgence, noting in April that the group was regaining ground in Borno, particularly in the Lake Chad region and Sambisa Forest. The use of advanced tactics, such as armed drones and improvised explosive devices, has further emboldened both Boko Haram and ISWAP, according to security analysts. The lack of response to residents’ warnings about the impending attack on Darul Jamal has fueled frustration, with many questioning the effectiveness of intelligence and military coordination.

The attack on Darul Jamal is a stark reminder of the ongoing threat posed by Boko Haram, even as Nigeria grapples with multiple security challenges, including banditry in the northwest and Biafra Self determination agitation in the southeast. in the southeast. For the residents of Darul Jamal, the dream of returning home has turned into a nightmare, with families mourning loved ones and survivors facing an uncertain future. As the Nigerian government and its security forces struggle to contain the insurgency, the people of Borno State continue to bear the brunt of a conflict that shows no signs of abating

Family Writers Press International.

Gunmen Attack Chinese Workers in Nigeria, Killing Eight Security Officials

  Gunmen Attack Chinese Workers in Nigeria, Killing Eight Security Officials

In a brazen assault that highlights Nigeria's escalating security challenges, gunmen ambushed a convoy of security personnel and foreign workers in southern Edo State, resulting in the deaths of eight security officials and the brief kidnapping of Chinese expatriates. The attack, which occurred on Friday, underscores the growing threat posed by armed criminal groups across the country, even in regions traditionally less affected by such violence.

According to Afolabi Babawale, spokesperson for the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC), the incident unfolded when suspected armed kidnappers targeted a group of Chinese nationals employed by local firm BUA Cement. The convoy, which included NSCDC operatives providing protection, was traveling through Edo State when the assailants struck. "The gunmen opened fire on the convoy, leading to a fierce exchange," Babawale stated in a press release on Saturday.

The assault claimed the lives of eight NSCDC operatives, with four others sustaining serious injuries. Among the victims were the Chinese workers, four of whom were initially abducted by the attackers. Security forces mounted a swift response, successfully rescuing the kidnapped expatriates later that day. However, Babawale confirmed that one Chinese worker remains unaccounted for, prompting ongoing search efforts.

BUA Cement, one of Nigeria's leading industrial conglomerates, has been involved in several infrastructure projects in the region, often relying on expatriate expertise for technical operations. The company has not yet issued an official statement on the incident, but sources close to the firm expressed relief over the partial resolution while voicing concerns about the safety of foreign personnel.

Nigeria has been grappling with a wave of violent crimes in recent years, including banditry, insurgency, and kidnappings for ransom. While the majority of such attacks have been concentrated in the northern states—where groups like Boko Haram and armed bandits have terrorized communities—kidnapping gangs have increasingly extended their operations southward. Edo State, rich in oil resources and industrial activity, has seen a rise in abductions targeting high-value individuals, including expatriates whose employers are willing to pay substantial ransoms.

This latest episode adds to a troubling pattern. Just last month, similar incidents in neighboring states resulted in the abduction of dozens of locals and foreigners, prompting calls for enhanced security measures from both government and private sectors. Human rights organizations have criticized the Nigerian authorities for inadequate protection of vulnerable workers, particularly in remote or industrial areas.

The NSCDC, a paramilitary agency under the Ministry of Interior, plays a key role in safeguarding critical infrastructure and personnel. The loss of eight officers in a single attack has drawn widespread condemnation, with labor unions and industry leaders demanding a thorough investigation and improved training for security escorts.

As rescue operations continue for the missing worker, Nigerian security forces have vowed to intensify patrols in the area. President Bola Tinubu's administration has prioritized combating insecurity as a cornerstone of its agenda, but incidents like this serve as stark reminders of the challenges ahead. For now, the nation mourns the fallen operatives while hoping for a swift and safe resolution to the ongoing crisis.

Family Writers Press International.

IPOB Exposes AP's Role in Nigeria’s Plot to Defame Biafra Movement

    IPOB Exposes AP's Role in Nigeria’s Plot to Defame Biafra Movement

The Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) issued a statement condemning an Associated Press (AP) publication that allegedly links IPOB and its leader, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, to Simon Ekpa’s recent conviction in Finland. IPOB denies any connection to Ekpa, stating he is not a member and operates a separate organization, Autopilot Government In Exile. They accuse AP and other media of participating in a coordinated disinformation campaign, led by the UK and Nigeria, to tarnish IPOB’s image and influence Kanu’s ongoing trial in Abuja. IPOB asserts its legitimacy as a global self-determination movement, legally recognized in over 60 countries, and criticizes Nigeria for labeling it a terrorist organization despite international laws supporting indigenous rights. They urge the public and media to resist spreading false narratives and vow to counter such efforts with evidence and truth.

The statement read: 

RE: COORDINATED DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN by AP AGAINST IPOB AND MAZI NNAMDI Kanu-IPOB

The attention of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) has been drawn to yet another vile and malicious publication—this time from the Associated Press (AP)—deliberately seeking to manipulate global perception by falsely linking IPOB and our leader, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, to the recent conviction of Simon Ekpa in Finland.

This deliberate distortion is part of the coordinated worldwide campaign spearheaded by the United Kingdom in aid of Nigeria to demonise IPOB, launder the battered image of a genocidal Nigerian state, and condition the international community to ignore the ongoing judicial fraud in Abuja against Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.

Let the record be set straight:

Simon Ekpa is not, and has never been, a member or leader of IPOB.

This fact is not speculative and should sink into the skull of these merchants of falsehood—it is on court record. IPOB, through due legal process, has repeatedly disowned Simon Ekpa in Nigerian courts and in foreign jurisdictions. Any attempt to force a link between IPOB and his personal actions in order to influence Hon. Justice James Omotosho come 10th of October, is wicked, dishonest, and mischievous.

IPOB is a lawful, global self-determination movement.

IPOB is present in over 100 countries and territories across the world. It is a legally recognised and registered entity in more than 60 countries, operating openly and transparently. No other nation on earth regards IPOB as a terrorist organisation except confused and frankly demented  Janjaweed irridentists and their desperate Southern power-hungry sidekicks. Only Nigeria, out of the entire comity of nations, persists in its futile attempt to stigmatise Biafra’s legitimate self-determination struggle—despite Nigerian laws (African Charter) recognising the rights of Indigenous peoples (Biafra) to agitate for self-determination.

Finnish court records speak for themselves.

The conviction of Simon Ekpa is personal to him and does not, in any way, implicate IPOB because he formed his own organisation called Autopilot Government In Exile. Yet, desperate media outlets like AP deliberately twist facts to suit their sponsors’ narrative. The dishonesty is transparent to anyone who bothers to check official records.

Global media and tech giants are on trial too.

If international media and platforms continue to employ or rely on Nigerians—who by nature of Nigeria’s broken system are corrupt and amenable to bribes—to file reports about IPOB, then the world should expect fraudulent interpretations of the truth. These compromised voices are not reporting—they are laundering Nigeria’s lies for quick cash.

The hypocrisy is glaring.

A Canadian court has already ruled that Nigeria’s ruling and opposition parties (APC and PDP) are terror organisations. Yet the Associated Press and their collaborators did not trumpet that ruling globally. But when it comes to IPOB—clean, peaceful, and law-abiding—they spare no effort in attempting to smear our name by association.

The narrative engineering is clear.

Just as Wikipedia was manipulated in June 2021 to pave the way for Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s abduction in Kenya, we are again witnessing a fresh round of media disinformation, timed to coincide with the critical stage of Kanu’s trial before Justice James Omotosho in Abuja. This is not journalism. It is psychological warfare.

The public should therefore be on high alert. The ongoing effort to stain the squeaky-clean image of IPOB is not about facts—it is about silencing a lawful self-determination struggle and sustaining Nigeria’s military occupation of Biafra land.

We call on responsible journalists and media houses worldwide to resist being used as instruments of imperial disinformation. IPOB will continue to expose these merchants of lies and defend our movement with truth and evidence. The statement concluded. 

Family Writers Press International .