NNAMDI KANU: JUSTICE BINTA NYAKO INTRODUCTION OF SHARIA TRIAL IN FHC: THE HEIGHT OF DISGRACE TO NIGERIA JUDICIARY
By Mazi Onyebuchi Eze
For Family Writers
It may not surprise me that Justice Binta Nyako of Nigeria Federal High Court Abuja does not know the differences between the High Court which she presides over and Sharia Court, differences between Sharia Law and Civil Law, differences between judicial procedures in High Court and Sharia Court, differences between cases that could be tried in the procedures of a High Court or Sharia Court, people of religious background that can be tried in the procedures of a High court or Sharia Court, but my greatest surprise is how Madam Binta Nyako, such poorly educated Judge found herself as a presiding Judge in Nigeria federal High Court. Well, having studied the general conducts and judicial dispositions of Justice Binta Nyako since the case filed of treasonable felony instituted by Nigeria government against Nnamdi Kanu, supreme leader of Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) and other 3 defendants, was opened on November 8, 2016, all I have seen is total disgrace and show of shame on Nigeria Judicial Council from a supposed Federal High Court Judge.
Apart from the all-around judicial show of shame which Justice Binta Nyako has meted on NJC reputation, which is anchored on her verdict somersaults she does which negates Nigeria judicial procedures, her obvious hostilities on Nnamdi Kanu (1st defendant) and Benjamin Madubugwu (3rd defendant) by denying them chances respectively to speak in court based on her opinion that they are all too vocal while speaking, illegal bail denial due to fear of jumping bail by defendants whose international passports and other travelling documents have been seized by Nigeria government and many other rascality too many to mention. She said that the Federal High Court is her own and she can do anything she wish whether Nnamdi Kanu or anybody want it or not. This is a single statement which renders her unqualified to continue to preside over the case under reference because no Judge owns any court in the land, even Chief Justice of Nigeria.
However, the height of judicial insensitivity ever demonstrated by the half-baked and quota system poorly lettered Judge is on her declaration that Nnamdi Kanu and other defendants must be tried secretly in the procedures of a Sharia Court. The trial Judge went ahead to tell the defense lawyers led by Hon Ifeanyi Ejiofor that they should mandatorily go and study Sharia Law which will expose them to a criteria which secret trial is conducted especially under Sharia Law.
Now, my questions are:
(1) Will Justice Binta Nyako continue to preside over the case when Sharia Law procedures of Secret trial set in because according to Sharia Law, a woman cannot be a Kadi or Grand Kadi of Sharia trial whether secret or no secret?
(2) Does she know that Section 262 (2) (a) to (e) of Nigeria constitution 1999 as amended, stipulated that Sharia Court and any secrecy associating to it should have jurisdiction on Islamic people or their personal matters such as marriage, etc?
By the reason of this show of shame on Nigeria Judicial Council from the table of Justice Binta Nyako, I hereby call on Hon Justice Walter Samuel Nkanu Onnoghen, Chief Justice of Nigeria and Chairman of National Judicial Council and Hon Justice Ibrahim Auta, the Chief Judge of Federal High to as a matter of urgency suspend Justice Binta Fatima Muritala-Nyako and quickly initiate an independent enquiry into what is the reason for her rascality as follows:
(1) What has been blackmailing her into verdict somersault in the case under reference.
(2) Whether any external interference has being forcing her to go outside the stipulated judicial procedures known in laws of Nigeria.
(3) Whether any person or group of persons from the Executive arm of government is directly or indirectly pressuring her against her conscience and her judicial oath.
(4) Whether the quashy independence of Judiciary in Nigeria where the president still single-handedly appoints Judges with mere recommendation of NJC and cheap confirmation of the senate contributed in what is terrifying the trial Judge.
(5) Whether any federal executive bodies including National Judicial Council, through conduct, negligence or dereliction contributed or participated in the general behavior of Justice Binta Nyako.
(6) Whether the extra-judicial utterances of public office holders not being members of Judiciary, including the president contributed in her judicial rascality.
By doing this, NJC would discover what is destroying the good reputation and image of Judiciary of Nigeria before the world. NJC must suspend Justice Binta Nyako from all judicial services in Nigeria until the enquiry is completed to enable NJC purge itself of show of shame and disgrace meted on it by the reckless attitude of Justice Binta Nyako. A stitch in time saves nine.
Edited by Emeka Gift
For Family Writers
By Mazi Onyebuchi Eze
For Family Writers
It may not surprise me that Justice Binta Nyako of Nigeria Federal High Court Abuja does not know the differences between the High Court which she presides over and Sharia Court, differences between Sharia Law and Civil Law, differences between judicial procedures in High Court and Sharia Court, differences between cases that could be tried in the procedures of a High Court or Sharia Court, people of religious background that can be tried in the procedures of a High court or Sharia Court, but my greatest surprise is how Madam Binta Nyako, such poorly educated Judge found herself as a presiding Judge in Nigeria federal High Court. Well, having studied the general conducts and judicial dispositions of Justice Binta Nyako since the case filed of treasonable felony instituted by Nigeria government against Nnamdi Kanu, supreme leader of Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) and other 3 defendants, was opened on November 8, 2016, all I have seen is total disgrace and show of shame on Nigeria Judicial Council from a supposed Federal High Court Judge.
Apart from the all-around judicial show of shame which Justice Binta Nyako has meted on NJC reputation, which is anchored on her verdict somersaults she does which negates Nigeria judicial procedures, her obvious hostilities on Nnamdi Kanu (1st defendant) and Benjamin Madubugwu (3rd defendant) by denying them chances respectively to speak in court based on her opinion that they are all too vocal while speaking, illegal bail denial due to fear of jumping bail by defendants whose international passports and other travelling documents have been seized by Nigeria government and many other rascality too many to mention. She said that the Federal High Court is her own and she can do anything she wish whether Nnamdi Kanu or anybody want it or not. This is a single statement which renders her unqualified to continue to preside over the case under reference because no Judge owns any court in the land, even Chief Justice of Nigeria.
However, the height of judicial insensitivity ever demonstrated by the half-baked and quota system poorly lettered Judge is on her declaration that Nnamdi Kanu and other defendants must be tried secretly in the procedures of a Sharia Court. The trial Judge went ahead to tell the defense lawyers led by Hon Ifeanyi Ejiofor that they should mandatorily go and study Sharia Law which will expose them to a criteria which secret trial is conducted especially under Sharia Law.
Now, my questions are:
(1) Will Justice Binta Nyako continue to preside over the case when Sharia Law procedures of Secret trial set in because according to Sharia Law, a woman cannot be a Kadi or Grand Kadi of Sharia trial whether secret or no secret?
(2) Does she know that Section 262 (2) (a) to (e) of Nigeria constitution 1999 as amended, stipulated that Sharia Court and any secrecy associating to it should have jurisdiction on Islamic people or their personal matters such as marriage, etc?
By the reason of this show of shame on Nigeria Judicial Council from the table of Justice Binta Nyako, I hereby call on Hon Justice Walter Samuel Nkanu Onnoghen, Chief Justice of Nigeria and Chairman of National Judicial Council and Hon Justice Ibrahim Auta, the Chief Judge of Federal High to as a matter of urgency suspend Justice Binta Fatima Muritala-Nyako and quickly initiate an independent enquiry into what is the reason for her rascality as follows:
(1) What has been blackmailing her into verdict somersault in the case under reference.
(2) Whether any external interference has being forcing her to go outside the stipulated judicial procedures known in laws of Nigeria.
(3) Whether any person or group of persons from the Executive arm of government is directly or indirectly pressuring her against her conscience and her judicial oath.
(4) Whether the quashy independence of Judiciary in Nigeria where the president still single-handedly appoints Judges with mere recommendation of NJC and cheap confirmation of the senate contributed in what is terrifying the trial Judge.
(5) Whether any federal executive bodies including National Judicial Council, through conduct, negligence or dereliction contributed or participated in the general behavior of Justice Binta Nyako.
(6) Whether the extra-judicial utterances of public office holders not being members of Judiciary, including the president contributed in her judicial rascality.
By doing this, NJC would discover what is destroying the good reputation and image of Judiciary of Nigeria before the world. NJC must suspend Justice Binta Nyako from all judicial services in Nigeria until the enquiry is completed to enable NJC purge itself of show of shame and disgrace meted on it by the reckless attitude of Justice Binta Nyako. A stitch in time saves nine.
Edited by Emeka Gift
For Family Writers
Injustice binta is an ass whole... She is as useless as buhari his brother who has never been to school before... The woman that gave birth to her was a prostitute... She should go and ask who her papa is... Moron that calls herself a judge ... Idiotic woman... I am really angry
ReplyDeleteBinta sounds more of a bingo to me. Is that a name of a person or a name of a dog?. Unbelievable. A judge claims the ownership of a federal high court?. Holy dog shit. Wait a minute someone should please piss on my head and tell me it's raining. Dumbass.
ReplyDeleteNigeria is a global disgrace and all her institutions are rotten. We (Biafra) must exit from this useless and hell on earth to create a better future for our children and their offspring.
ReplyDeleteNigeria is a shame to humanity.
ReplyDeleteI don't know why some people still call themselves nigerians
In the event that your picked lawyer has a law firm, there will unquestionably be different lawyers who can take care of you on the off chance that he isn't accessible.
ReplyDeletewww.frouharlaw.com/
Each state and a few significant urban communities have associations of criminal defense lawyers who can offer reference administrations or online catalogs.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.stephenjackcriminallawyer.ca/